Friday, April 29, 2011

Maajid Nawaz(former Islamist) speaks at 911 Memorial Preview Site

 UPDATE: Scroll down please for thoughts and observations regarding Maajid Nawaz from friend and reader G. Perrry -

On April 28, 2011 ( at 6:30PM) "9/11, Today and Tomorrow" Speakers Series at the 9/11 Memorial Preview Site invited Maajid Nawaz,

an ex-member of an Islamist extremist group, to detail his personal experience with the Islamic radicalization process and to explain how he works to confront it.

This presentation in the speakers series was called, " The Front Lines of Counter Terrorism: Confronting Islamist Extremist Propaganda ".

Maajid Nawaz is a former a high-ranking member of the Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir and spent four years in an Egyptian prison for his affiliation with the group. He emerged to help establish the Quillium Foundation, the world's first counter-extremism think tank, where he serves as executive director.
He is also the founder of Khudi, a counter-extremism social movement working to promote a democratic culture in Pakistan.

There are some who feel that Nawaz is NOT what he appears to be.

Here is his 2008 testimony before Senator Lieberman's Homeland Security Committee (this is an 8 page pdf) . It would seem that even though his advocacy of a purely personal Islam  devoid of all political "Islamism" is good, on the other hand, his representations about Shariah in the Lieberman testimony and about Islam (etc) are all (pretty much without exception) not factually based; including his assertions about the Shariah State.

Nawaz speaks for 38 minutes and the Q and A is approx 18 minutes.

At 33, with slightly greying hair, Maajid arrived dressed in very British-'mod' attire: trousers and trench coat which harkened back to a 1960's Beatles-look (particularly those pants.) And there seemed to be quite a few women (and men) who were in awe of Nawaz.  Glowing smiles. Groupies, almost. You could feel their quiet-eagerness awaiting his speech.

As for his presentation, Nawaz gave us a way-too-safe 30 minute biographical rehash of his life that can easily be read on-line. Perhaps some of this is necessary to 'set the stage', but other than his pointed criticism of Peter King (he supports the committee but feels King was not the man to lead it and a wise-crack about Glenn Beck) to this observer,  the teaser "Confronting Islamist Extremist Propaganda" was barely addressed.  Of the questions asked of Nawaz, the focus was on  'The Narrative'. This was the magic-word of the evening "The Narrative"... over and over....

The audience was small, perhaps about 30, but this is an intimate space and isn't meant for large gatherings. And since we observed the disappointment of a few  tourists who had wanted to enter the Memorial Preview site (it was closed to the public at 5 pm  rather than the usual 7 pm) perhaps they might have been invited-in (or not)...

A slide show of the Preview Site and the audience after the presentation:

What was accomplished by inviting Maakid Nawaz to the Memorial site is unclear. It has been suggested that perhaps Maajid Nawaz' appearance at the Memorial Preview Site should NOT have gone  on without critical comment. They ask,"Should this be the purpose of the 9/11 Memorial."


From  G. Perry
I'm going to admit right off the bat that I've only watched a third of the speech so far, but I've come to a few incipient observations.

First of all, thanks for the video. Regardless of what you think about the speaker, what happened during that event is important irrespective of what occurs in the future at Ground Zero. I'm glad I had the opportunity to view it, at least in part.

Secondly, as to whether or not he should be invited to speak at what's sacred ground for so many Americans-especially New Yorkers-I don't believe he should for a number of reasons not the least of which is that he has no existential connection to the families who lost loved ones on that day.

Theoretically, someone who's been involved in jihadist violence could have something useful to say about combating his fellow "brothers." Even so, I doubt the appropriate place for that person to speak is at a memorial to 2,800 people who were slain by adherents to the very same religion. That's if you belive Maajid Nawaz is sincere, which is another question altogether.

I know it's hard to infer people's true beliefs based upon their speeches, and this problem is faced by a lot of Muslims or ex-Muslims who are ostensibly opposed to jihad or have renounced their previous anti-American, anti-Semitic stands, e.g. Walid Shoebat, Musab Yousef, among many others. However, after having listened to what Nawaz has to say, I'm not entirely convinced that he's sincere.

The Quilliam Foundation is essentially a creature of the British government. I know they admit this when questioned, but I don't think that many people who are casual observers realize that all of its funding sources derive, albeit indirectly, from the average UK taxpayer. Keep in mind, this is the same government that for decades sponsored official, "moderate Islamists associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, e.g. The Muslim Council of Britain. They still sponsor these groups-once Abu Hamza was ejected from Finsbury the mosque was reopened under new management, that management being the Muslim Brotherhood. I'm not necessarily saying the two organizations are analogous, but it's something to consider.

Plus, you have to consider the composition of this group's staff:

It seems to be comprised primarily of Muslims who claim they've renounced a belief in Islamism, but don't present much evidence that they've renounced their belief in violent jihad. A case in point is Noman Benotman-the fellow who's been quoted in recent days in news stories proclaiming his insider knowledge of who's going to replace UBL in Al Qaeda's leadership. In other words, someone who's supposedly ostracized himself completely from the jihadist subculture represented by Al Qaeda is still close enough to the situation to know who will succeed Osama Bin Laden. Either that, or he's simply full of hot air-I opt for the latter explanation, but either way, it doesn't paint a very flattering picture of Quilliam as an institution.

Check out this article from The New Republic a few years ago, which examined Mr. Benotman's alleged break with AQ:

You'll notice that he still justifies the jihad in Iraq. In other words, "resistance" against Americans who are "occupying" Arab-Muslim lands is perfectly legitimate. So blowing someone up with an IED or beheading them is okay if you happen to live in the Middle East, but verboten if you live in England. To describe that as a culturally relativist attitude is an understatement. Granted, his views might have changed in the past three years, but I haven't found a quote from him in the intervening period disclaiming responsibility for the views he expressed to Peter Bergen in that article. Which isn't to say that Nawaz holds the same views, but you have to assume they share some commonalities, since they are both on the board of directors of Quilliam.

Finally, the rest of the Quilliam fellows seem to be an ad hoc mixture of radical leftists who've written for such esteemed publications as Comment is Free-a bastion of anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism-and Counterpunch, which is almost as bad. They seem to be primarily concerned with alleged right wing violence aimed at Muslim Britons-a point that Nawaz himself emphasized quite ineffectively during the portion of the speech I watched.

I suppose you have to address the BNP and Blood and Honour in order to maintain some street credibility with leftists, and the theme of racist nationalism and radical Islam being opposite poles is a recurring element in contemporary British culture-for example, it's referred to repeatedly in one of my favorite English novels, White Teeth-but the amount of emphasis they place on this issue-and the fact that they assume that it is as dangerous as the creeping sharia found in the UK-makes question their true motivations. While I do believe that there can be true leftists who oppose Islamism on ideological grounds, I don't believe that their contribution to this debate will be the decisive factor, and often times their philosophy occludes the issue. A perfect illustration of this phenomenon is Tarek Fatah, a committed Rousseauian and die-hard leftist who thinks the best way to combat the Muslim Brotherhood and like-minded organizations is to embrace the values of republican France.

I realize a lot of good people-Frank Gaffney among them-embrace this man, but I think his contribution to the debate is completely counterproductive, and his real views-which include a passionate enmity towards Israel-were exposed during a debate with Irshad Manji.

In short, I tend to agree with you on this subject.  I'm not saying Maajid Nawaz is a complete fraud, but I also don't believe his views have a place at the burial site for so many Americans who were murdered by Islam.

-good times, G. Perry


Wednesday, April 20, 2011

NYC Tax Day Tea Party - Foley Square- 2011

On April 15, 2011, NYC . A small but determined Tax Day Tea Party Rally was held outside the Courthouse in Foley Square. 
DSCN0536 copy 
DSCN0569 copy

DSCN0531 copy

DSCN0568 copy

America continues to fight the Economic Ruin of the "Progressive" Leftists.

 DSCN0563 copy

Stop the Socialist assault on our Constitution.

DSCN0497 copy

 "EPIC FAIL" No kidding!

DSCN0487 copy

DSCN0485 copy

VIDEO is just a short bit of the people gathering before the speakers started

Even though I couldn't stay for the two hour event, got lots of pictures of the people and their signs. The message loud and clear: DEMAND FISCAL SANITY

DSCN0443 copy 

DSCN0453 copy DSCN0494 copy

DSCN0556 copy
DSCN0448 copy

DSCN0464 copy

  DEFEND our Constitution

DSCN0454 copy

DSCN0449 copy

DSCN0455 copy

STOP Obama's FAILED and FLAWED Presidency from destroying our freedoms.

DSCN0555 copy 

DSCN0463 copy
                                                                                                                                                                         Fox News Business was there....

DSCN0522 copy
DSCN0534 copy

And two very ODD infiltrators...
 DSCN0545 copy  DSCN0546 copy


 DSCN0459 copy

DSCN0444 copy
DSCN0490 copy

                                          2012...Or BUST

DSCN0516 copy


 Make it Happen

DSCN0481 copy DSCN0457 copy


DSCN0478 copy

SLIDE-SHOW of all the pictures....

Sunday, April 17, 2011

"A Sahara Spring" in the City....

Coming to a SCHOOL near you (hat tip DR)


Whose SAHARA SPRING?...Dare we ask...?

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Times Square or "Red Square" Shakedown of America (video & pics)

 For 90 minutes, on April 9, 2011, Times Square was transformed into RED Square.The Leftists were all over the city. Union Square was taken over by the Muslim contingent and Times Square was...well...RED Square.

 DSCN9989 copy
(please scroll past photos  for video)
DSCN9990 copy

The Union-sponsored Socialist Shakedown of our economy was in full bloom.

 DSCN0030 copy


Seemed like every union was there: teachers, colleges, schools, educators.

 DSCN0216 copy

Entertainment, stage-hands....

DSCN0239 copy

DSCN0200 copy

Sanitation, Letter Carriers, Nursing, Health Care, Building Trades (UAW, electricians, iron workers):

DSCN0042 copy

DSCN0172 copy

DSCN0212 copy

Yep....the  AFL-CIO was our HOST.

DSCN0064 copy

DSCN0094 copy

Once they've DESTROYED "Corporate America"...

 DSCN0096 copy

WHO's gonna pay their salaries?

DSCN0146 copy

DSCN0148 copy
LOTS of happy union members (and Marxists) came out to play so 7th Avenue was PACKED on both sides of the street.
 DSCN0158 copy

Something the police NEVER allow other rallies to do is to stand on the WEST side of 7th Ave. But, since our public-sector police are UNION, they were being overly accommodating (it would seem) to the AFL-CIO.

DSCN0289 copy

According to an officer I asked, that last block from 38th to 37th was never used. The pens were empty. Rather than force the crowd to fill the pens all the way to 38th street,  the police even let the crowd jam the sidewalk on the East side of the avenue.

DSCN0084 copy


The police pushed the crowd so far in to 7th avenue that they left only about a lane and a half open for traffic.

DSCN0234 copy

Guess they wanted the mass of bodies down-front. Near the stage...

DSCN0016 copy

Can we say PHOTO-OP?

 DSCN0084 copy

Yes, the oh-so angry-unions put on a big-show with lots of Marxist, propaganda envy-baiting speeches.
Some signs were so filled with contradiction,"Who ya gonna call if there is a crisis?" Not these lame-brains:

DSCN0298 copy

DSCN0270 copy

 DSCN0183 copy

So many teachers proudly marched to the Socialist meme of "Down with the Rich. Up with the Little-Guy".
DSCN0167 copy

DSCN0174 copy

DSCN0197 copy

Preaching ENVY, Racism & Resentment.

DSCN0257 copy

 DSCN0219 copy


DSCN0218 copy

And the Chant of the Hour: WE ARE ONE.

 DSCN0302 copy

Their Goal: Destroy everything that made America a successful economy.

DSCN0292 copy

Down with Initiative & Creativity. Down with Individualism. UP with the Collective!

 DSCN0242 copy

 More Lies, Propaganda & Character Assassination...

  DSCN0264 copy

DSCN0244 copy

Assisted by the happy, fist-pumping IDIOTS who think the fat-cat union goons chanting "We are One".... are their friends in need. Indeed? SAD. Very sad.

 DSCN0241 copy

DSCN0182 copy

 Clearly, red is more than just a colour...

DSCN0160 copy

DSCN0178 copy

DSCN0161 copy

It's a STATE of MIND.

DSCN0115 copy

 Here begins ... the VIDEO.... Part 1

Part 2 (and 3)video bounce a bit. Crowd was pushing and arm was t-ir-ed. What matters is you can still hear what these tools were preaching and chanting...over and over...

Part 3 ....the inspirational grousing grew as the Union tools rouse their 'warriors' to rise up against CORPORATE America...

Slide show of all the pictures before and after the rally

And to finish off the whole zombie-time experience, be sure to check out Oleg Atbashian's fabulous book, "Shakedown Socialism" at